<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.bulletinarchive.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Malcolm Dando | Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists</title>
 <link>http://www.bulletinarchive.org/web-edition/columnists/malcolm-dando</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>European biosecurity efforts fall short</title>
 <link>http://www.bulletinarchive.org/web-edition/columnists/malcolm-dando/european-biosecurity-efforts-fall-short</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;The European Commission is on the right path among government institutions in putting issues of biosecurity and biosafety on the public agenda, yet even their efforts demonstrate how far governments have to go.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bulletinarchive.org/category/topic/biosecurity">Biosecurity</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:43:48 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Malcolm Dando</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3982 at http://www.bulletinarchive.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Making the dual-use problem a &quot;piece of cake&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.bulletinarchive.org/web-edition/columnists/malcolm-dando/making-the-dual-use-problem-a-piece-of-cake</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some academic conferences are encouraging because progress is being made in a field. Others are daunting because of the amount of work that clearly still needs to be done. The conference I attended in the beginning of June, on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crb.uu.se/symposia/2008/index.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&quot;Dual Uses of Biomedicine: Whose responsibility?&quot;&lt;/a&gt; left me feeling both encouraged and daunted.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bulletinarchive.org/category/topic/biosecurity">Biosecurity</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:51:00 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Malcolm Dando</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3593 at http://www.bulletinarchive.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Raising life scientists&#039; awareness</title>
 <link>http://www.bulletinarchive.org/web-edition/columnists/malcolm-dando/raising-life-scientists-awareness</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;In April 1980, the &lt;em&gt;Bulletin&lt;/em&gt; published an article by former intelligence analyst Henry T. Nash titled &quot;The Bureaucratization of Homicide.&quot; (The article was subsequently reprinted in E. P. Thompson&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Protest and Survive&lt;/em&gt;.) In the article, Nash reflected on his experiences as a nuclear targeting planner in the U.S.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bulletinarchive.org/category/topic/biosecurity">Biosecurity</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:04:00 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Malcolm Dando</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3122 at http://www.bulletinarchive.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missed opportunities at the chemical weapons treaty meeting</title>
 <link>http://www.bulletinarchive.org/web-edition/columnists/malcolm-dando/missed-opportunities-the-chemical-weapons-treaty-meeting</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Prior to the Chemical Weapons Convention&#039;s (CWC) Second Review Conference last month, several attempts were made to raise the issue of the potential for incapacitating chemical agents to skirt the convention&#039;s rules. Despite these efforts, when the convention adjourned in mid-April, little had been done to address the issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bulletinarchive.org/category/topic/biosecurity">Biosecurity</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:08:00 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Malcolm Dando</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2479 at http://www.bulletinarchive.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Getting scientists involved in arms control</title>
 <link>http://www.bulletinarchive.org/web-edition/columnists/malcolm-dando/getting-scientists-involved-arms-control</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Earlier this month Macedonian Amb. Georgi Avramchev addressed the &quot;Second International Forum on Biosecurity&quot; in Budapest and stressed the importance of including scientists and scientific organizations in the proceedings of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BWC). Delegations at BWC meetings have always included scientific experts, but Avramchev confirmed what many in attendance knew to be true, that scientists had not always been given the time or opportunity to contribute their expertise adequately.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bulletinarchive.org/category/topic/biosecurity">Biosecurity</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:13:00 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Malcolm Dando</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2184 at http://www.bulletinarchive.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Dutch experiment with a biosecurity code of conduct</title>
 <link>http://www.bulletinarchive.org/web-edition/columnists/malcolm-dando/the-dutch-experiment-with-a-biosecurity-code-of-conduct</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;In recent years, scientists and security experts have advocated for codes of conduct as a means to prevent the modern life sciences from being misused for hostile purposes--the so-called dual-use problem. But how exactly would such codes work, and how would they be received by the scientific community? The implementation of a code of conduct in the Netherlands in mid-2007 serves as an example of what can be expected.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Malcolm Dando</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">170 at http://www.bulletinarchive.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
